Push.House Review 2026: Honest Pros, Cons and Pricing

Push.House launched around 2019 and positioned itself as a direct push notification network, meaning they own their subscriber base rather than brokering third-party inventory. over the years they have expanded into popunder (onclick), native, and what they call “social bar” or in-page push formats. the platform targets affiliates, media buyers, and direct advertisers who want volume at competitive CPMs and CPCs without navigating the gatekeeping of premium ad exchanges.

the headline verdict: Push.House is a legitimate network with real volume, particularly strong in Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. if you are running sweepstakes, dating, gambling, or nutra in Tier 2 or Tier 3 GEOs on a controlled budget, it deserves a spot in your rotation. if you are buying US, UK, AU, or CA traffic for anything requiring clean brand-safe inventory, you will likely be disappointed by the volume ceiling and quality variance.

this review is based on hands-on use of the platform, community feedback from affiliate forums (including BHW threads going back to 2022), and pricing data pulled directly from the Push.House dashboard as of 2026.

what Push.House actually does

Push.House operates as a self-serve advertising platform built around four primary traffic formats. the core product is classic web push notifications: users who have opted into push alerts on publisher sites receive your creative as a browser notification, even when that site is not open. this format is browser-dependent, which matters for one reason: iOS Safari blocks it, meaning your push campaigns reach Android and desktop users primarily.

to address that gap, Push.House offers in-page push (they call it “in-page push” or sometimes “social bar” depending on the UI version you are looking at). these are banner-style units that mimic the visual appearance of push notifications but render inside the webpage itself, making them iOS-compatible. the quality of in-page push traffic varies more than classic push because it pulls from display placements.

popunder (onclick) is the second major format. when a user clicks anywhere on a publisher page, a new browser window or tab opens with your landing page. pricing is CPM-based. this format converts well for landing pages that do not need warm audiences: download offers, sweepstakes with low friction, and redirect chains.

the native format on Push.House is less developed than their push and pop products. creative placements are smaller, targeting options are similar to push, and there is no dedicated native SSP integration that I can identify from the platform or their documentation. treat the native offering as a bonus, not a reason to choose Push.House.

targeting options include GEO (country level, with some city-level options in larger markets), device type, OS, browser, language, carrier, and subscriber age. subscriber age targeting is useful and underrated: it lets you exclude fresh subscribers (who have high CTRs but low conversion rates in some verticals) or target users who have been on the list longer and thus self-select as engaged.

pricing

Push.House uses a credit deposit model. you fund your account, campaigns draw down your balance. there is no monthly subscription.

minimum deposit: $50 (as of 2026), accepted via credit card, PayPal, Capitalist, and several crypto options including USDT.

push notification CPC: bid floors vary by GEO. in Tier 3 markets (e.g., Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria) floors can be as low as $0.001. Tier 2 markets like Brazil, Indonesia, and India typically floor around $0.003-$0.006. Tier 1 markets (US, UK, DE, AU) floor around $0.01-$0.02, but the available volume at those floors is limited.

popunder CPM: floors start around $0.05-$0.10 for low-demand GEOs and range up to $0.80-$1.50 for Tier 1 markets, all as of 2026. the recommended bid for competitive delivery in mid-tier markets is generally 2-3x the floor.

in-page push CPC: slightly lower floors than classic push in most GEOs.

there are no setup fees, no minimum spend commitments, and no account management fees at the self-serve level. Push.House does offer managed accounts for larger spenders but does not publish a spend threshold publicly. if you are spending $3,000+ per month you can likely request one.

what works

volume in Tier 2 and Tier 3 GEOs is genuine. if you are targeting Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, or Latin America, Push.House has real subscriber volume. campaigns in ID, BR, PH, UA, and PL can scale to hundreds of thousands of impressions per day without hitting delivery walls, which is not always true on smaller networks.

budget control is functional. daily caps, total campaign caps, and CPC/CPM bid adjustments all work as expected. there is no minimum daily budget floor, which lets you run low-spend tests before scaling. this matters for affiliates who want to validate an angle before committing.

in-page push solves the iOS problem. for verticals where mobile iOS traffic is meaningful (dating, finance, certain nutra), the in-page push format gives you access to that audience without switching platforms. not every network has a polished version of this format; Push.House’s implementation is cleaner than several competitors.

account approval is fast and unsupervised. unlike some networks that require manual review of your business model, Push.House’s self-serve flow gets you from registration to live campaign in under an hour in most cases. for affiliates used to ad network gatekeeping, this is a practical advantage.

subscriber age targeting adds a useful optimization lever. being able to filter by how long a user has been subscribed to push notifications is a real signal that most networks do not expose. experienced buyers use this to cut low-quality fresh traffic that inflates CTR without converting.

what doesn’t

fraud transparency is limited. Push.House states they use internal anti-fraud filtering, but they do not publish details about their methodology, third-party audit partnerships, or what happens when you report click fraud. for verticals sensitive to bot traffic (lead gen, affiliate CPA campaigns with strict advertiser scrubbing), you are largely trusting the network’s unverifiable claims. campaigns in certain GEOs will occasionally produce click patterns that look automated. community threads on BHW have documented this specifically in certain Southeast Asian sub-GEOs.

reporting lag. the dashboard does not update in real time. during peak campaign activity, you may be looking at stats that are 15-30 minutes old. this makes intraday optimization harder than it should be in 2026, when most competitive networks offer near-real-time reporting. if you are optimizing by the hour, this is a real operational problem.

Tier 1 volume is thin. the US, UK, and AU inventory is there, but the scale is modest compared to PropellerAds or Zeropark. if your primary market is English-speaking Tier 1 traffic, Push.House will not be your primary source. you will hit delivery ceilings before reaching meaningful scale.

no native conversion tracking. Push.House does not have a built-in tracker. all conversion attribution depends on your postback setup with a third-party tracker (Voluum, Binom, RedTrack, etc.). this is fairly standard for the category, but the postback documentation is sparse and the support team’s ability to troubleshoot postback issues is limited. expect to do your own debugging.

support outside business hours is slow. the live chat is staffed during what appears to be Eastern European business hours. tickets submitted on weekends or evenings often wait 12-24 hours for a meaningful response. for a network where campaigns can burn budget while you wait for help, this is a notable gap. you can find better support responsiveness at Adsterra and PropellerAds at comparable spend levels.

who should buy / who should skip

buy if: - you are running sweepstakes, dating, gambling, nutra, or utilities in Tier 2 or Tier 3 GEOs - you need in-page push to cover iOS mobile traffic without switching networks - you want to test push or pop traffic with a small initial budget before committing to a larger network - you are an affiliate comfortable managing your own tracker and postback setup - you are targeting Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, or Latin America specifically

skip if: - your campaigns require clean, brand-safe inventory with third-party fraud verification - you are buying primarily US, UK, CA, or AU traffic at any meaningful scale - your vertical involves strict advertiser-side scrubbing that penalizes bot or low-quality traffic - you need real-time reporting for intraday bidding decisions - you are new to paid traffic and need hands-on account management support

alternatives to consider

for a broader look at where Push.House sits in the competitive landscape, see our traffic network category overview and the best traffic networks for affiliates roundup.

PropellerAds - the most direct competitor and, for most buyers, the default recommendation. PropellerAds has more Tier 1 volume, a more mature anti-fraud layer with third-party verification options, and better real-time reporting. their pop and push CPMs run slightly higher in competitive GEOs, but the quality consistency is better. see our full PropellerAds review.

Adsterra - stronger for display and popunder if you are running direct advertiser deals or need a managed service option. Adsterra’s support is more responsive and their CPM floors in Tier 1 GEOs are more competitive for pop traffic. less focused on push as a format, so not a 1-to-1 substitute if push is your primary channel.

RichPush - a push-only network (no pop or native) with a reputation for cleaner subscriber lists and more aggressive fraud filtering. CPCs are typically higher than Push.House, but advertisers in sensitive verticals (finance, regulated nutra) have reported better advertiser-side scrubbing pass rates. if push is your only format and quality matters more than price, RichPush is worth testing.

verdict

Push.House is a functional, budget-accessible traffic network with genuine Tier 2 and Tier 3 push and popunder volume. it is not a premium network, does not pretend to be one, and prices accordingly. the platform works for affiliates who know what they are buying and have the tracking infrastructure to manage it themselves. the fraud transparency gap and thin Tier 1 inventory are real limitations that push serious buyers toward PropellerAds or Zeropark for primary spend. treat Push.House as a supplemental source or a testing ground for new GEOs and angles, not a one-stop shop.

disclosure: this review may contain affiliate links. pricing independently verified, vendors cannot purchase reviews.